Points won by each set: | 31-22, 36-25 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
27 % Edberg – 15 of 54
11 % Haarhuis – 7 of 60
“I played really well today, I don’t think I can play much better than I did today”, said Edberg [5] in the post-match ceremony. There was 3-all (15/30) in the 1st set when he struck an ace DTT, and for approximately thirty minutes afterwards, he was playing like in the years 1990-91 when remained at the top of men’s tennis. Haarhuis [42] fought off a double break point at 0:4 in the 2nd set avoiding a bagel set. The 28-year-old Dutchman was looking for his maiden title, it was the second of his eight finals (the only title comes from Jakarta ’95 where the draw was Challenger alike).
Edberg’s route to his 38th title:
1 Gary Muller 6-1, 6-4
2 Anders Jarryd 6-1, 6-1
Q Henri Leconte 6-4, 6-2
S Gilbert Schaller 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-4
W Paul Haarhuis 6-3, 6-2
Points won by each set: | 31-22, 36-25 |
Points won directly behind the serve:
27 % Edberg – 15 of 54
11 % Haarhuis – 7 of 60
“I played really well today, I don’t think I can play much better than I did today”, said Edberg [5] in the post-match ceremony. There was 3-all (15/30) in the 1st set when he struck an ace DTT, and for approximately thirty minutes afterwards, he was playing like in the years 1990-91 when remained at the top of men’s tennis. Haarhuis [42] fought off a double break point at 0:4 in the 2nd set avoiding a bagel set. The 28-year-old Dutchman was looking for his maiden title, it was the second of his eight finals (the only title comes from Jakarta ’95 where the draw was Challenger alike).
Edberg’s route to his 38th title:
1 Gary Muller 6-1, 6-4
2 Anders Jarryd 6-1, 6-1
Q Henri Leconte 6-4, 6-2
S Gilbert Schaller 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-4
W Paul Haarhuis 6-3, 6-2